Does A's action of flicking a glove in B's face constitute offensive contact?

The action of flicking a glove in B's face can indeed be seen as offensive contact because it meets the criteria for intentional torts regarding battery. To establish offensive contact, it must be shown that the contact was intended and that a reasonable person would consider such contact offensive.

In this scenario, A flicks a glove at B with the intent to make contact, which indicates deliberate action. Even though the contact might seem minor, the standard for what constitutes "offensive" does not depend solely on the severity of the contact but rather on the nature of the act and the social norms regarding physical interactions. Flicking a glove in someone's face can be interpreted as an affront to that person's dignity and an unwanted invasion of personal space.

The reasoning behind considering it offensive is that the act of flicking, particularly aimed at someone's face, can be seen as disrespectful or derogatory, which fulfills the requirement for offensive contact under tort law principles. This aligns with the understanding that intentional actions that result in contact deemed offensive by societal standards are actionable. Thus, A's action qualifies as intentional offensive touching, leading to the conclusion that the correct answer is indeed that it constitutes offensive contact.