In the case pertaining to Bronwen and Helmut, which key component establishes liability for emotional harm?

Liability for emotional harm in cases like the one involving Bronwen and Helmut often hinges on the nature and impact of the defendant's conduct. The duration and severity of the stalking behavior are critical elements because they determine how the behavior affects the victim's mental and emotional state.

In instances of emotional distress, courts typically assess whether the conduct was extreme or outrageous and whether it caused significant emotional turmoil. Stalking behavior, especially when persistent and severe, can lead to substantial anxiety, fear, and other emotional distress in the victim. Thus, looking at the duration and severity allows for a comprehensive understanding of the psychological impact on Bronwen, which is fundamental in establishing liability for emotional harm.

Other factors, such as Helmut's intentions or Bronwen's involvement as a victim, may play a role, but they are secondary to the actual behavior and its consequences. The focus remains on the harm caused by the conduct itself rather than the intentions behind it or the victim's specific reactions. Therefore, B is the key component that establishes liability for emotional harm in this context.