When A takes shelter at B's dock during a storm, can B use force to prevent A's entry?

In the scenario where A takes shelter at B's dock during a storm, the correct answer indicates that B cannot use force to prevent A's entry. This is grounded in the legal principles surrounding necessity and the law concerning private property.

When faced with an emergency situation, such as a storm, individuals are sometimes permitted to take refuge on someone else's property to avoid greater harm. In this case, A's need for shelter is a compelling reason that outweighs B's right to exclude A from his property. The law typically recognizes that in emergencies, the necessity for safety may legalize temporary sheltering without the property owner's consent.

Moreover, using force to prevent A’s entry could potentially expose B to liability for any injury or damages that occur as a result of using unreasonable force. The law usually requires that property owners respond to intrusions in a proportional manner, especially when safety is at stake.

The other provided options suggest scenarios where the use of force or liability may come into play, but they do not recognize the principles of necessity and emergency defenses, which are essential in this context. Therefore, B's inability to use force is supported by these overarching legal principles.

This interpretation reflects a balance between an individual's safety during emergencies and the rights of property owners,